Showing posts with label cognitive outcomes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cognitive outcomes. Show all posts

Sunday, July 11, 2021

[Article Review] The Impact of High Screen Time on Cognitive and Behavioral Outcomes in Extremely Preterm Children

Screen Time and Cognitive Outcomes in Extremely Preterm Children

Vohr et al. (2021) conducted a cohort study examining the relationship between screen time and various developmental outcomes in children born extremely preterm (EPT). The findings highlight the influence of high screen time on cognitive, executive, and behavioral functions at school age. This post reviews the study’s context, results, and implications for clinical and family practices.

Background

Children born at less than 28 weeks gestation face unique developmental challenges due to the complexities of extreme prematurity. As digital devices become increasingly present in daily life, their potential impact on these children’s development has garnered attention. This study aimed to explore how screen time interacts with cognitive and behavioral outcomes in EPT children, alongside other lifestyle factors such as physical activity and environmental settings.

Key Insights

  • Impact on Cognitive Abilities: High screen time was associated with lower full-scale IQ scores in children evaluated at ages 6 to 7. These findings align with broader research linking excessive screen exposure to reduced cognitive performance.
  • Executive Function Deficits: Increased screen time correlated with challenges in executive functions, including metacognition, inhibition, and attention regulation. Children in the high screen time group also exhibited elevated symptoms of inattention and impulsivity.
  • Environmental Factors: The presence of a television or computer in the child’s bedroom contributed to further behavioral concerns, including hyperactivity and impulsivity, underscoring the role of environmental settings in shaping developmental outcomes.

Significance

This study highlights the potential risks of excessive screen time for children born extremely preterm. Given their heightened vulnerability to cognitive and behavioral difficulties, it underscores the need for targeted interventions and informed guidance for families. These findings also contribute to ongoing discussions about how digital environments intersect with early developmental trajectories.

Future Directions

The findings call for further research to understand how different types of screen use—educational versus recreational—affect developmental outcomes in EPT children. Additionally, studies could explore how parental involvement and structured routines might mitigate the negative effects of screen exposure in this population.

Conclusion

Vohr et al.’s (2021) research underscores the importance of managing screen time for children born extremely preterm. By recognizing the developmental risks associated with high screen exposure, clinicians and families can work together to create supportive environments that foster better cognitive and behavioral outcomes.

Reference:
Vohr, B. R., McGowan, E. C., Bann, C., Das, A., Higgins, R., Hintz, S., & Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. (2021). Association of High Screen-Time Use With School-age Cognitive, Executive Function, and Behavior Outcomes in Extremely Preterm Children. JAMA Pediatrics, 175(10), 1025-1034. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2041

Sunday, December 22, 2019

[Article Review] Maternal Obesity and Child Cognitive Outcomes

Maternal Prepregnancy Obesity and Cognitive Outcomes in Children

This post reviews the findings of Widen et al. (2019), who examined how maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) affect cognitive outcomes in children. The study focused on a diverse, low-income, multiethnic cohort to explore potential sex-specific differences in child neurodevelopment linked to maternal obesity.

Background

Child cognitive development has been a growing area of research, particularly in understanding how maternal health before and during pregnancy influences outcomes. Widen et al. aimed to address gaps in this field by analyzing whether prepregnancy BMI and GWG impact child neurodevelopment differently for boys and girls. The study included 368 African American and Dominican women and their children, providing insights into populations often underrepresented in similar research.

Key Insights

  • Sex-Specific Associations: The study found that maternal prepregnancy obesity was linked to lower full-scale IQ scores in boys, while no similar effect was observed in girls.
  • No Significant Effect of GWG: Gestational weight gain did not show a measurable impact on cognitive outcomes for either sex in the study sample.
  • Diverse Population Studied: The cohort consisted of low-income, multiethnic participants, enhancing the generalizability of the findings to populations often affected by health disparities.

Significance

This research highlights the potential impact of maternal health on child development, particularly among underserved communities. The findings suggest that public health interventions targeting maternal obesity could have meaningful implications for improving cognitive outcomes in children. Additionally, the sex-specific nature of the findings underscores the need for tailored approaches to address the unique developmental needs of boys and girls.

Future Directions

While the study provided valuable insights, it did not explore the mechanisms linking maternal obesity to child cognitive outcomes. Future research could focus on understanding these pathways, including potential biological, nutritional, or environmental factors. Expanding studies to include a broader range of socioeconomic and ethnic groups would also enhance our understanding of these relationships and support the development of more inclusive interventions.

Conclusion

The study by Widen et al. (2019) adds to the growing body of evidence linking maternal health to child development. By highlighting the sex-specific effects of prepregnancy obesity, it provides actionable insights for public health initiatives aimed at supporting maternal and child well-being. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing maternal obesity as part of broader efforts to reduce disparities and enhance developmental outcomes in children.

Reference:
Widen, E. M., Nichols, A. R., Kahn, L. G., Factor-Litvak, P., Insel, B. J., Hoepner, L., Dube, S. M., Rauh, V., Perera, F., & Rundle, A. (2019). Prepregnancy obesity is associated with cognitive outcomes in boys in a low-income, multiethnic birth cohort. BMC Pediatrics, 19, 507. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1853-4

Friday, May 31, 2019

[Article Review] The Benefits of Midday Napping for Children's Health and Well-being

The Role of Midday Napping in Children's Development

Midday napping is a common practice in many cultures, especially among children. Liu et al. (2019) investigated the potential benefits of this habit for cognitive, emotional, and physical health outcomes in children. Their findings provide valuable insights into how napping may influence various aspects of child development.

Background

The study by Liu et al. (2019) is part of the China Jintan Cohort Study, which examines developmental health trends in elementary school children. Midday napping is widely practiced in the study population, making it an ideal setting to explore its associations with factors such as cognitive performance, psychological well-being, and behavioral regulation. While previous research has linked sleep to better health and academic outcomes, this study delves deeper into midday naps as a specific practice.

Key Insights

  • Cognitive Benefits: Children who napped more frequently or for longer durations showed higher verbal IQ scores and better academic achievement, suggesting a link between naps and improved cognitive function.
  • Psychological Well-Being: Regular napping was associated with greater happiness, grit, and self-control, as well as fewer internalizing behavioral problems.
  • Behavioral and Physical Health Outcomes: While significant improvements were noted in emotional regulation, the study found limited effects on externalizing behaviors and no significant associations with metabolic health markers or performance IQ.

Significance

The findings suggest that midday napping could serve as a practical intervention to enhance children’s cognitive and emotional health. Regular naps might mitigate the effects of insufficient nighttime sleep, improving daytime functioning and long-term academic and behavioral outcomes. By highlighting the role of naps in development, this study contributes to a broader understanding of sleep's importance in childhood health and education.

Future Directions

While the study provides compelling evidence for the benefits of napping, more research is needed to establish causal relationships. Large-scale intervention studies could help determine optimal napping durations and frequencies for specific outcomes. Additionally, examining napping practices across diverse populations would enhance the generalizability of the findings.

Conclusion

Liu et al. (2019) offer valuable insights into the role of midday napping in childhood development. Their research suggests that regular naps are linked to improvements in cognition, emotional well-being, and behavior. By incorporating these findings into sleep and education practices, parents and educators can better support children’s growth and learning. Further research will help refine these recommendations and maximize the benefits of healthy sleep habits.

Reference:
Liu, J., Feng, R., Ji, X., Cui, N., Raine, A., & Mednick, S. C. (2019). Midday napping in children: associations between nap frequency and duration across cognitive, positive psychological well-being, behavioral, and metabolic health outcomes. Sleep, 42(9), zsz126. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsz126

Thursday, February 21, 2019

[Article Review] Brain's Response to Socioeconomic Status: A Longitudinal Study

The Influence of Childhood Socioeconomic Status on Brain Development

McDermott et al. (2019) conducted a longitudinal study examining how childhood socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with structural brain development. By analyzing over 1,200 MRI scans from youth aged 5 to 25 years, the researchers explored connections between SES and the anatomy of the brain, offering important insights into cognitive and emotional development.

Background

Socioeconomic status has long been studied for its impact on educational outcomes and cognitive performance. However, its influence on brain development has only recently become a focus of neuroimaging research. McDermott et al.’s study builds on this work by identifying specific cortical and subcortical regions affected by SES, highlighting how these variations relate to cognitive and emotional processing.

Key Insights

  • Positive Associations Between SES and Brain Volume: Higher SES was linked to larger total brain, cortical, and subcortical volumes across the studied age range.
  • Regional Variations in Brain Anatomy: SES correlated with areal expansion in the lateral prefrontal, anterior cingulate, lateral temporal, and superior parietal cortices, as well as in subregions such as the ventrolateral thalamus and medial amygdala-hippocampus.
  • Functional Implications: These cortical regions are involved in sensorimotor functions, language, memory, and emotional regulation, indicating SES’s impact on systems critical for daily functioning and long-term cognitive outcomes.

Significance

The findings from this study contribute to understanding the biological pathways through which SES influences cognitive abilities. The identification of neuroanatomical mediators, some independent of IQ, suggests that SES shapes both structural and functional brain development in ways that extend beyond traditional measures of intelligence. This research highlights the role of social and environmental factors in shaping developmental trajectories.

Future Directions

Future research could focus on the specific environmental mechanisms underlying these associations. For example, examining the roles of access to education, nutrition, or emotional support may provide further clarity. Additionally, expanding studies to include more diverse populations could help generalize findings and inform interventions aimed at mitigating disparities linked to SES.

Conclusion

This longitudinal study by McDermott et al. (2019) underscores the relationship between childhood socioeconomic status and brain development. By linking SES to specific neuroanatomical variations, the research provides a foundation for understanding how social conditions influence cognitive and emotional growth. These findings reinforce the need to address socioeconomic disparities as part of efforts to support healthy development.

Reference:
McDermott, C. L., Seidlitz, J., Nadig, A., Liu, S., Clasen, L. S., Blumenthal, J. D., ... & Raznahan, A. (2019). Longitudinally Mapping Childhood Socioeconomic Status Associations with Cortical and Subcortical Morphology. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(8), 1365-1373. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1808-18.2018